 |
Adult gull at Rainham Marshes this afternoon showing characters of Slaty-backed Gull.
Photos and text © Dominic Mitchell - do not use without permission. Fees apply. |
I would like to have posted this news earlier today, but it's been one of those days ...
I paid a short visit to Rainham Marshes today, originally with the intention of trying out a new camera. However, when I got to the site there were so many gulls present that I decided to focus on gulling, so left the scope on the tripod and instead slung my trusty old 50D, 500mm f4 lens and 1.4x extender over my shoulder, foregoing using the new body while doing some serious birding.
Having worked through the gulls in the Coldharbour Lane area for about an hour and failed to find any Caspians and just a single Yellow-legged Gull, an adult, I began to wonder if the session would pay off. Bar a couple of interesting-looking Herring Gulls there seemed little else worthy of scrutiny. I was panning back through the massed ranks for about the eighth time when I stopped dead in my tracks. My gaze fixed on a large, dark-mantled gull that was immediately distinctive, and instantly I said to myself "adult Slaty-backed Gull!" Then I suspended belief in what I was thinking and looked at it again, feeling I must be kidding myself - yet, to my eyes at least, it still seemed to scream 'Slaty-back!'.
As I started to look at it more closely, another gull dropped in to land almost on top of it, flushing the bird. I panicked, reaching for the camera while trying to keep an eye on the bird. Fortunately, it came back down only a few metres away, so in case it flew again I fired off a short series of record shots (unfortunately, and unavoidably, directly through chain-link fencing, so they are not as clear, sharp and bright as the bird was 'in life'; they are all similar to the best two in the series, published here).
 |
Note relative size and upperpart coloration of bird (left) compared to nearby Herring and Great Black-backed Gulls.
Photos and text © Dominic Mitchell - do not use without permission. Fees apply. |
Here is a summary transcription of the points I noted at the time (please note this is
not a full write-up, submission or discussion):
Size: almost size of nearby Great Black-backeds (possibly larger than one individual), and clearly significantly larger than Lesser Black-backed Gull and 'typical'
argenteus Herring Gull. One nearby
argentatus of similar size (all these taxa present in numbers in close proximity today).
Structure: bulky and solid, though different in 'character' to Great Black-backed Gull. Head less 'powerful' than the latter, more like Herring Gull, and in profile appeared more pot-bellied and a little shorter legged than Great Black-back.
Plumage: the combination of slaty-grey upperparts with very broad white tertial/secondary edges was immediately distinctive, especially taken in combination with the pink legs and large size. These broad white edges then continued, more narrowly but still conspicuously, along the folded edge of the wing. The upperparts were uniformly and solidly grey, with no trace of browner remnant immature markings; if anything, there was the slightest bluish tone to the upperparts, very subtly distinct from
graellsii Lesser Black-back (this feature being mentioned to several others in discussion of the bird). The primaries were black, with four conspicuous white tips visible beyond the tertials at rest. The tail was white. The head and neck were diffusely and extensively streaked pale brown, these streaks combining to form a hood which extended at the front to the breast, becoming less boldy marked in this area. Streaking was densest around and especially below the eye. The rest of the underparts were unsullied white.
Bare parts: iris seemed pale yellow. Bill dull yellowish, dullest and more colourless towards base, brightening towards tip, and with small red spot near tip of lower mandible; not especially bulbous at the gonys. Legs shorter than nearby Great Black-back and pink, rather stronger in tone and darker than they appear in these 'uncontrasty' images - while watching through the scope, at times they seemed almost bubblegum-pink.
After watching the bird and noting the above points, I started to ring some local birders in a bid to get others to see it. While I was on the first call, still watching the gull through the scope one-handed, it took off and seemed to fly towards Wennington Marshes. In the very brief moment between when it took flight and when I lost it, I was unable to note detail on the underwing and wing-tip, as it was quickly hidden in a flurry of wings.
Eventually, three other observers joined me to help try and refind the bird, which we failed to do before dark. I remained reasonably happy that it was probably a Slaty-backed Gull, a species I have seen in Asia previously (though not for about nine years), but as always with large gulls, caution must be exercised. On seeing one of the other observers' copy of Howell and Dunn 2007, I was surprised that some adult-type Slaty-backeds can look almost black above, and that fact caused me some concern as this bird was closer in tone to
graellsii Lesser Black-backed Gull (if anything, the grey appears subtly lighter in these images than some
graellsii, but the quality of the images may also have affected this slightly).
I therefore welcome opinions on this bird, whatever its true identity - please leave your comments below. In the meantime, there is much research to do on this in the days ahead.
Postscript
Thanks to those who have taken the time to discuss this bird during the course of the evening. Early feedback, including from Martin Garner and others, is encouraging towards the identification of what would be the first British record of this species. The next thing to do is refind it, observe the open wing and hopefully photograph it. Having been slightly concerned initially about the upperpart tone, I have this evening checked Olsen and Larsson 2003 and other references, and also discussed the bird with Chris Gibbins (who found the Western Palearctic's first individual in Latvia two years ago), and it seems that the Rainham bird is unproblematic in this respect, falling within the likely variation for Slaty-backed Gull. But more comments have been solicited from other gull experts and online to try and gain a full range of opinion.
IMPORTANT - ACCESS AT RAINHAM
There are many thousands of gulls at Rainham at the moment, and they favour the RSPB reserve, the adjacent Wennington Marshes (very large numbers of loafing birds), the river/foreshore (partly tide dependent) and the tip (strictly out of bounds at all times). If you are planning to look for the bird, it is essential to follow these instructions, provided this evening by the RSPB:
Parking options:
- Rainham Marshes RSPB main car park, off New Tank Hill Road, RM19 1SZ. Park and walk along river wall to the west and then on the cycle path on the inland side towards the tip, stopping to scan Wennington Marshes on your right.
- Rainham Riverside car park off Coldharbour Lane. Only room for about 20 cars. Do not park in or obstruct entrance road or disabled spaces. If parking here walk back down the path to Coldharbour Lane and follow the cycle path east past the tip to Wennington and then Aveley Bay.
DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES PARK ON COLDHARBOUR LANE (OR EVEN ON THE VERGE): THIS IS HIGHLY DANGEROUS AND SECURITY WILL MOVE YOU ON.
DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES PARK IN THE WORKS CAR PARK FOR THE VEOLIA LANDFILL SITE OR THE INDUSTRIAL UNITS AT COLDHARBOUR POINT. SECURITY WILL CLAMP ALL UNAUTHORISED CARS.
Viewing options
- Scan the fields of Wennington Marshes, where all the gulls come down to rest during the day.
- Enter the reserve via the visitor centre and check Aveley Pools and the Target Pools, where gulls also come down to bathe.
- Check the foreshore to the east of the Stone Barges, accessed via the Rainham Riverside car park as birds also commute here to bathe.
- Check Aveley Bay for similar reasons.
- DO NOT ATTEMPT TO ACCESS THE LANDFILL SITE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. It can be viewed more distantly from the cycle path, but the gulls are much easier to check on Wennington Marshes, where they linger for longer and are far less active.